Rimmel decided to stick with model Kate Moss after she admitted taking cocaine in 2005, even though other backers such as Burberry and Chanel rapidly retreated. The controversy has since blown over, with the episode arguably increasing Rimmel's profile and helping boost Moss' international appeal. Kate Moss became a bigger star because of the controversy and the brands ended up coming back to her and signing her to even bigger deals.
Do ambassadors deserve
a second chance?
I think
everyone deserves a second chance, but it does depend on what they've done,
personally all companies will draw the line as to what is acceptable. It should
all be in the brand ambassador's contract too, so that there aren't any
surprises. I don't think incidents with brand ambassadors are ever good PR. If
you asked the brand if they wanted it to happen, I'm sure they wouldn't. But
with a decent PR plan and management, it can be rescued.
Nevertheless,
sponsors are often spooked when they are associated with individuals with colorful personal lives, especially if that color is provided by illegal
drugs. Although public mishaps often
lead to a personality, and, by association, a brand, receiving media ridicule,
the damage is rarely long-term.
Pepsi,
for instance, has a questionable policy when it comes to brand ambassadors,
with Michael Jackson, Britney Spears and Madonna representing the brand as
badly behaved as the three were it didn’t prove to be detrimental to the brand.
Hiring and firing
Hiring
and firing miscreant public figures isn't cheap and brands are advised to think
carefully before choosing brand ambassadors. I don't think brands spend enough
time analyzing potential brand ambassadors, an agency should research (the
stars), know about their personal lives and know the issues surrounding them.
There is no 100% guarantee about any person's behavior, but it's a big investment
to have a brand ambassador and more time could be spent choosing them.

No comments:
Post a Comment